知識產權英語文章
1、有哪位英語大神能幫我翻譯一下,這是我寫的畢業論文摘要,不要網上機器直接翻譯的那種,跪求ԅ
進入21世紀以來,中國的中小企業在經濟方面得到了迅猛的發展。國務院發展研究中心企業研究所研究室副主任項安波在接受中國經濟時報記者采訪時,提緩衫出在中國經濟進入新常態的大背景下,中國的中小企業在生存和發展方面面臨新的挑戰和機遇。當面對綜合上升、經濟結構調整和發展方式轉變提出的更高要求時,不少中小企業根據市場發展環境的變化以及發展趨勢開始積極調整和主動適應。有一小部分中小企業在尋求應對經濟發展困境過程中開始意識到知識產權管理在發展中的促進作用。但是相比較美國、德國等國家而言,我國中小企業普遍還是比較忽視知識產權管理在發展中的促進作用,這是當前中國中小企業知識產權管理面臨的現狀。在一些開始意識到知識產權管理重要性的中小企業當中,由於中小企業自身實力有限導致其在知識產權管理方面的經費投入佔比有限,難以足夠的投入去建立完善的知識產權管理體系。為了解決當今中國中小企業在知識產權管理過程中遇到的困境,企業知識產權管理戰略過程的完整展開顯得尤為重要。企業知識產權管理戰略過程的完整展塵基開,大致可分為戰略制定、戰略實施和戰略控制三個階段。中小企業通過對企業所處的外部環境和內部條件的戰略分析擾兄腔,確定企業總體戰略目標,並在知識產權管理戰略目標的框架下制定具體的知識產權戰略,繼而實施戰略,對實施過程進行控制。
Since twenty-first Century, China's small and medium enterprises in the economy has been rapid development. The State Council Development Research Center Enterprise Institute Research Center Director Xiang Anbo in an interview with reporters China economic times, put forward in the background of Chinese economy into the new normal, China SMEs are facing new challenges and opportunities for survival and development. When faced with the higher requirements of the overall economic restructuring and the transformation of the mode of development, many small and medium-sized enterprises in accordance with changes in the market environment and the development trend began to actively adjust and actively adapt to. A small number of small and medium enterprises in the process of seeking to deal with the plight of economic development began to realize the role of intellectual property management in the development of the promotion. But compared to the United States, Germany and other countries, China's small and medium-sized enterprises generally still relatively neglected role in promoting intellectual property management in development, this is the status quo of intellectual property management Chinese of small and medium sized enterprises. In some began to realize the importance of intellectual property management of small and medium sized enterprises, because of the small and medium-sized enterprise strength is limited resulting in the management of intellectual property investment proportion is limited, difficult to invest enough to establish a sound intellectual property management system. In order to solve the difficulties encountered in the management of intellectual property rights of Chinese SMEs, it is particularly important to carry out the strategic process of enterprise intellectual property management. The whole process of enterprise intellectual property rights management strategy can be divided into three stages: strategy formulation, strategy implementation and strategic control. Analysis of small and medium sized enterprises through analyzing the external environment and internal conditions of the enterprise strategy, determine the overall strategic objectives, and to develop the strategy of intellectual property rights in the framework of specific strategic objectives of intellectual property management, and implement strategies to control the implementation process.
2、求一篇英語文章,要有10個介詞,常用的。急急急急急急!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
介詞我都用括弧標注了:
My cousin is coming (to) visit me (on) January the first (at) two o'clock. We haven't seen each other (for) five years already. (Since) he left China for school, I was (under) tremendous pressure for the reason that I lived (in) my uncle's, or my cousin's father's house.
Here he is in the coffee shop, sitting (near) the garbage can. He was wearing the red scarf I gave him (as) a gift before he left, and I know he took good care of it because it was (like) new. Then, I started to cry.
3、知識產權法英文
知識產權法英文如下:
intellectual property right。
知識產權法是指因調整知識產權的歸屬、行使、管理和保護等活動中產生的社會關系的法律規范的總稱。按照智力活動成果的不同,知嘩世局識產權可以分為著作權、商標權、專利權、發明權、發現權等。
法律依據:《中華人民共和國民法典》
第一百二十三條 民事主體依法享有知識產權。
知識產權是權利人依法就下列客體享有的專有的權利:
(一)作品;
(二)發明、實用新型、外觀設計;
(三)商標;
(四)地理標志;
(五)商業秘密;
(六)集成電路布圖設計;
(七)植物新品種;
(八)法律規定的其他客體亂讓。
第四百四十四條返羨 以注冊商標專用權、專利權、著作權等知識產權中的財產權出質的,質權自辦理出質登記時設立。
知識產權中的財產權出質後,出質人不得轉讓或者許可他人使用,但是出質人與質權人協商同意的除外。出質人轉讓或者許可他人使用出質的知識產權中的財產權所得的價款,應當向質權人提前清償債務或者提存。
第六百條 出賣具有知識產權的標的物的,除法律另有規定或者當事人另有約定外,該標的物的知識產權不屬於買受人。
4、知識產權英文
知識產權
[名] intellectual property right;
[例句]隨著公司向知識產權公司轉型,其業務規模顯著下降。
There was a significant decline in the size of the business as the company transitioned to an intellectual property company.
5、求關於 知識 或 知識產權的英文名言或好的句子
Knowldge 知識篇 Activity is the only road to knowledge . (George Bernard Shaw , British dramatist) 行動是通往知識的唯一道路 。 (英國劇作家 肖伯納. G.) A free man obtains knowledge from many sources 1 besides books . (Thomas Jefferson , American president) 一個自由的人除了從書本上獲取知識外,還可以從許多別的來源獲得知識。(美國總統 傑斐遜 . T.) A great part to the information I have was acquired by looking up something and finding something else on the way. (Adams Franklin , American humorist ) 我的大部分知識都是這樣獲得的:在尋找某個資料時意外的發現了另上的資料。(美國幽默作家 富蘭克林. A.) If a man empties his purse into his head , no man can take it away from him , an investment in knowledge always pays the best interest . (Benjamin Franklin , American president ) 傾已所有追求知識,沒有人能奪走它;向知識投資,收益最佳。(美國總統 富蘭克林. B.) Imagination is more important than knowledge .(Albert Einstein , American scientist ) 想像力比知識更為重要。 (美國科學家 愛因斯坦. A. ) Knowledge is power . (Francis Bacon , British philosopher ) 知識就是力量。 (英國哲學家 培根. F.) The empty vessels make the greatest sound . (William Shakespeare , British dramatist ) 滿瓶不響,半瓶咣當。 (英國劇作家 莎士比亞. W.)
6、知識產權的意義英語作文
範文背誦
How to Protect Intellectual Property
Along with the advance of the society, more and more technologies and innovations are put forward by scientists and other people, thus we attach much importance to protectingthese immaterial things by resorting to intellectual property rights. Although these things are intangible, they are as crucial as the tangible assets we possess. Recently there appear a lot of cases which violate the intellectual property rights and affect the interests of people concerned. How should we deal with this problem?
To begin with, measures should be taken to arouse public awareness so that the majority may acquire a comprehensive understanding of this special property. Next, indivials and organizations who enjoy the property must equip themselves with adequate knowledge of related laws and regulations. Once violated, it's of great importance for them to refer to the useful tools. Last but not least, it's the governments responsibility to perfect the system of safe guarding.
As I see it, intellectual property represents the progress of society, so we should exert ourselves to protect it. And the issue of being violated will be solved ultimately if the above measures can be put into practice.
>>亮點詞彙
①advancen.進步,前進
②innovationn.革新,創新
③attach importance to認為……很重要
④immateriala.非實物的,無形的
⑤intangiblea.無形的
⑥resort to求助於
⑦cruciala.關鍵的,重要的
⑧comprehensivea.全面的,綜合性的
⑨equip...with使有準備,使能夠(做某事)
⑩refer...to參考,查閱
11.exert oneself盡力,努力
12.ultimatelyad.最後,最終
7、急需:關於美國337條款的英文文章,最好帶中文翻譯
美國337條款解讀
□ 文希凱
在美國,專利權人有權依法禁止他人在美國生產其受保護的專利產品和在海外仿製其專利產品後銷往美國。有兩條途徑可以起訴這種侵權行為:利用1930年美國關稅法第337條(以下簡稱第337條)向美國國際貿易委員會提出;向聯邦地區法院提出。但越來越多的美國企業利用337條並非為防止國際侵權,而是為阻止進口。隨著國際社會對保護知識產權的日益重視和中美貿易持續增長,在美國開展業務的中國生產商必須正視其出於不公平貿易而被美國公司起訴至美國國際貿易委員會、貨物被美國海關禁止進口的危險。為此,知識產權專家提醒,要掌握規則,防「337糾紛」於未然。
何為337條款
根據第337條,美國國際貿易委員會有權拒絕一切侵犯美國知識產權的產品進入美國。作為「准司法機構」,美國國際貿易委員會起保護美國公司免受外國公司的不公平競爭的作用。美國國際貿易委員會一旦認定某項進口貨物存在不公平貿易,遭受不公平貿易的美國公司會向其提出美國國門應向該貨物關閉的要求。
根據第337條,可向美拆仿弊國國際貿易委員會提起的起訴一般包括進口貨物存在對知識產權侵犯的指控。美國國際貿易委員會對勝訴方的救濟的形式旅族包括大姿排除令——對某特定產品禁止進口,以及停止或拒絕令——禁止進口方進入,也可同時發出兩個命令。可見,一旦美國權利人勝訴,對進口方將產生致命打擊。
第337條禁止的是一切不公平競爭行為或向美國進口產品中的任何不公平行為,所謂「進口貿易中的不公平做法」是指:「貨物所有人、進口人、收貨人或其代理人將貨物進口美國或在美國銷售時使用不公平競爭方法和不公平行為,其威脅或效果足以摧毀或實質損害美國國內產業,或阻礙此類產業的建立,或限制、壟斷了美國的貿易和商業,或者將貨物進口美國、或為進口美國而銷售,或進口美國後銷售,而該種貨物侵犯了美國己經登記的有效且可執行的專利權、商標權、版權或集成電路晶元布圖設計專有權,並且在這四項權利方面己經存在或者尚在建立」。
這表明衡量不公平做法的標準是該進口是否對美國某產業的生存或發展構成威脅或損害,例如妨礙或扼制某產業的形成、導致在美國形成貿易壟斷等。第337條特別用於禁止任何侵犯美國知識產權的產品進入美國市場,禁止任何在國外利用有效美國專利方法生產的產品進入美國市場。這在客觀上使美國知識產權權利人比外國競爭者更具優勢,明顯使外國競爭者在進入美國市場時受第337條訴訟的威脅或困擾,而必須考慮用昂貴的訴訟程序維護自己的利益。第337條提供的救濟較之美國國內侵權訴訟當事人向美國地區法院起訴所能得到的救濟也更為直接。此外,外國公司在美國國際貿易委員會中面對的行政程序也比在美國地區法院更為繁瑣。
委員會的調查
根據第337條,進口行為是否為不公平做法取決於美國國際貿易委員會的調查,其「應當依請求或者依其職權對任何指控的違法行為進行調查。在調查開始後,委員會應當就此在聯邦登記簿上發布公告,並應當盡早結束調查並作出決定。為了促進快速審判,委員會應當在調查開始後的45天內,確定其作出終局決定的目標日」。整個程序通常需要一年,較為復雜的案件則可以延期6個月結束,但也必須在18個月內完成。
美國國際貿易委員會應當及時指定行政法官,並將337調查轉移由該法官主持。如果調查結果是當事方違犯了第337條的規定,委員會將發出命令,禁止由違法方輸入的所有侵權貨物進入美國。「考慮到這種排除對公共健康和福利、美國經濟中的競爭條件、類似的或者直接的競爭產品在美國的生產、美國消費者的影響」,委員會若認為不應當排除該類物品進入美國,也可選擇不採取行動。
在選擇禁止貨物進入美國的情況下,美國國際貿易委員會的該禁止令應僅限於被發現違法的、由違法方輸入的所有物品,這是「有限排除令」或「有限禁止令」。另一方面,為避免有限排除令的片面性,或如果己對侵權情況有所了解,而且難於識別貨物的來源,美國國際貿易委員會有權不管進口方的身份對所有類似產品一律予以排除,這被稱為「普遍排除令」,或「總禁止令」。它禁止某一種類的所有進口產品進入美國市場,而不區別原產地或生產商和目前尚未掌握的未來的生產商和進口商。
如果在調查進行之間,美國國際貿易委員會認為侵權正在發生,有權發布臨時排除令。但進口方只要按美國國際貿易委員會規定的金額提供擔保,充分保護美國起訴方的利益不受傷害,則進口方的貨物仍可進入美國市場。除排除令外,美國國際貿易委員會可以發布命令,要求違法方停止和不再從事不公平競爭行為,也可能發布臨時停止或拒絕令。不遵守命令將面臨大約10萬美元或相當於其每天違令輸入美國產品的國內價值兩倍的民事處罰。
美國國際貿易委員會也能發布命令,對違反第337條規定輸入的產品進行扣押和沒收。扣押和沒收產品只發生在權利人、進口方或者保管人先前曾嘗試輸入該產品,該產品由於排除令被拒絕進口,而且進口方在前次進口時曾被送達排除令並已被通知其產品有可能被扣押和沒收的情況。
終局決定
無論美國國際貿易委員會作何種決定,最後須由美國總統核審。美國總統收到決定後60天內可否定美國國際貿易委員會的決定,則該決定停止有效。如果總統贊同美國國際貿易委員會的命令,或者在60天內不否定該命令,除可能接受美國聯邦法院上訴庭的司法審查外,美國國際貿易委員會的決定和命令則成為終局決定。
總之,根據337條款,美國企業只要能證明進口產品有違法或侵犯知識產權的事實,並且美國國內確實有相關產業即可申請國際貿易委員會立案,對競爭對手起到牽制和限製作用。對應訴企業來講,由於調查內容通常涉及知識產權保護和專業技術,往往必須依靠律師和技術專家,負擔十分繁重。企業應盡量預先做好與知識產權有關的調查研究工作,盡量避免自己陷入337條款糾紛。
Interpretation of the U.S. Section 337
□ Wen Xikai
In the United States, people have the right to patent law to prohibit the proction of others in the United States protected its patent procts and overseas patent imitation of its procts to the United States. There are two ways to prosecute such violations: The 1930 U.S. tariff law Article 337 (hereinafter referred to Article 337) to the U.S. International Trade Commission; to the federal district court. But more and more U.S. companies are not using 337 for the prevention of international infringement, but in order to prevent the imports. As the international community to protect intellectual property rights and the increasing emphasis on sustained growth of Sino-US trade in the United States operating in China must face up to its manufacturers an unfair trade for U.S. companies have been prosecuted to the U.S. International Trade Commission, the goods prohibited by the U.S. Customs The risk of imports. To that end, intellectual property experts advise, it is necessary to have rules, anti-"337 disputes" in Weiran.
What is Section 337
Under section 337, the U.S. International Trade Commission the right to reject all violations of U.S. intellectual property procts into the United States. As a "quasi-judicial body," the U.S. International Trade Commission to protect U.S. companies from foreign companies, the role of unfair competition. Once the U.S. International Trade Commission that imports of goods there is a fair trade, unfair trade, U.S. companies will be put to it by the United States the country should close the request of the goods.
Under section 337 may be directed to the U.S. International Trade Commission instituted the prosecution of the general existence of imports of goods, including allegations of violations of intellectual property rights. The U.S. International Trade Commission Sheng Sufang relief in the form of exclusion orders - of a certain proct import ban and stop or refuse to - banned the import side access, can also issued two orders. Thus, if the United States won the right people, the importer will have a fatal blow.
Section 337 is prohibited by all acts of unfair competition or imported procts to the United States in any unfair act, the so-called "import of unfair trade practices" means: "all goods, the importer, the consignee or his agent Imports of goods will be sold in the United States or the United States the use of unfair methods of competition and unfair acts, the threat or effect to destroy or damage the U.S. domestic instry in real terms, or hinder the establishment of such instries, or limit, a monopoly of the U.S. trade and Commercial, or imports of goods the United States, or imports for the United States and sales, or sales of imports after the United States, and the kinds of violations of the United States has been registered valid, enforceable patent, trademark, right or integrated circuit chip layout Proprietary design, and in this four rights has been established there, or is still. "
This shows that the practice is unfair to measure the standard is whether the import of a certain U.S. instries pose a threat to the survival or development or damage to, for example, prevent or curb the formation of a certain instry, resulting in the formation of the U.S. trade monopolies. Article 337 specifically for the prohibition of any violations of U.S. intellectual property procts into the U.S. market, to prohibit any use of overseas proction of an effective U.S. patent procts into the U.S. market. This objective in the United States on intellectual property rights than foreign competitors a better position, obviously to foreign competitors in entering the U.S. market, subject to section 337 of the threat of litigation or distress, but must consider the use of expensive proceres to safeguard its interests . Section 337 provides relief infringement litigants than the United States to the United States District Court for prosecution can also be a relief more directly. In addition, foreign companies in the United States International Trade Commission in the face of the administrative proceres than in the United States District Court for a more cumbersome.
Commission of Inquiry
Under section 337, imports of whether unfair practices on the U.S. International Trade Commission's investigation, "or should be, if so requested, according to the terms of reference to any alleged offence under investigation. In the investigation began, the Committee should be in the Federal Register this Book on the announcement, and should be concluded as soon as possible to investigate and make a decision. In order to facilitate speedy trial, the Committee should be the start of the investigation within 45 days, to determine its final decision on the target. " The whole process usually takes a year, more complicated cases can be delayed six months ended, but must also be completed within 18 months.
The U.S. International Trade Commission administrative judge should be designated a timely manner, and 337 investigations of judges presided over by the transfer. If the findings of the parties is a violation of the provisions of section 337, the Commission will issue an order to prohibit the illegal importation from all infringing goods entering the United States. "Taking into account this exclusion of public health and welfare of the U.S. economy in the conditions of competition, similar or directly competitive procts in the United States, proction, the impact on U.S. consumers", the Commission should not rule out the possibility that if such goods into the U.S., Also may choose not to take action.
In the choice of prohibited goods entering the United States circumstances, the U.S. International Trade Commission of the prohibition order should be limited to the offence was discovered by the illegal importation of all goods, which is "limited exclusion order" or "limited prohibition order." On the other hand, the limited exclusion order to avoid one-sidedness, or if the violations have to understand, but difficult to identify the source of goods, the U.S. International Trade Commission have the right to import, regardless of the identity of all similar procts will be excluded, which was Known as the "general rule out", or "total prohibition order." It prohibits certain types of all imported procts into the U.S. market, without distinction of origin or proction and has not yet grasp the future of manufacturers and importers.
If the survey was concted between the U.S. International Trade Commission that violations are taking place, the power to issue temporary exclusion orders. But as long as the imports by the U.S. International Trade Commission the amount specified in the provision of security and full protection of the interests of the United States prosecution from harm, the importer of the goods can enter the U.S. market. In addition to the exclusion, the U.S. International Trade Commission may issue an order to stop the illegal and no longer engage in acts of unfair competition, may stop or refuse to issue interim orders. Does not comply with the order will face about 100,000 U.S. dollars or the equivalent of the daily breach of its procts enter the United States twice the value of the domestic civil penalties.
The U.S. International Trade Commission also issued an order, the breach of section 337 provisions of imported procts seized and confiscated. Seizure and Confiscation of procts only in the right people, the importer or the custodian had previously tried to enter the proct, the proct was refused e to the exclusion of imports, but imports in the previous imports had been served and has been ruled out so that informed Procts are likely to be seizure and confiscation of the situation.
Final decision
Whether the United States International Trade Commission made the decision to end the trial by the President of the United States. President of the United States received a decision within 60 days after denying the U.S. International Trade Commission's decision, the decision to cease to be valid. If the president agreed with the U.S. International Trade Commission's order, or within 60 days does not deny the order, with the exception of the United States Federal Court may accept the judicial review the Court of Appeal, the U.S. International Trade Commission's decision and order has become final.
In short, under Section 337, U.S. companies can prove that as long as the imported procts have breached the law or the fact that the infringement of intellectual property rights, and the United States do have the relevant instries can file applications for International Trade Commission, the rivals played to contain and limit the role. Of the enterprises involved in speaking, usually because of investigation involving intellectual property protection and expertise, often must rely on lawyers and technical experts, the burden is very heavy. Enterprises should do a good job as far as possible in advance related to intellectual property rights investigations and studies, to avoid disputes themselves into 337 articles.
8、國家知識產權局專利審查協作中心英語筆試資料
專利專業英語詞彙
abandonment of a patent 放棄專利權
abandonment of a patent application 放棄專利申請
abridgment 文摘
abstract 文摘(摘要)
abuse of patent 濫用專利權
action for infringement of patent 專利侵權訴訟
action of a patent 專利訴訟
address for service 文件送達地址
affidavit 誓書
allowance 准許
amendment 修改
annual fee 年費
annuity 年費
anticipation 佔先
appeal 上訴
appellation of origin 原產地名稱
applicant for patent 專利申請人
application date 申請日期
application documents 申請案文件
application fee 申請費
application for patent 專利申請(案)
application laying open for public inspection 公開供公眾審查的申請
application number 申請號
application papers 申請案文件
arbitration 仲裁
art 技術
article of manufacture 製品
assignee 受讓人
assignment 轉讓
assignor 轉讓人
author of the invention 發明人
author's certificate 發明人證書
basic patent 基本專利
Berne Convention 伯爾尼公約
Berne Union 伯爾尼聯盟
best mode 最佳方式
bibliographic data 著錄資料
BIRPI 保護知識產權聯合國國際局
board of appeals 申訴委員會
breach of confidence 泄密
Budapest Treaty on the International Recognition of the Deposit of Microorganisms for the Purposes of Patent Procere 國際承認用於專利程序的微生物保存布達佩斯條約
burden of proof 舉證責任
case law 判例法
caveat 預告
certificate of addition 增補證書
certificate of correction 更正證明書
certificate of patent 專利證書
certified 經認證的副本
Chemical Abstracts 化學文摘
citation 引證
claim 權項
classifier 分類員
co-applicants 共同申請人
co-inventors 共同發明人
color coding 色碼制
commissioner 專利局長
Community Patent Convention 共同體專利公約
complete application 完整的申請案
complete description 完整的敘述
complete specification 完整的說明書
comptroller 專利局長
compulsory license 強制許可證
conception 概念
conception date 概念日期
confidential application 機密申請
confidential information 保密情報
conflict award 沖突裁定
conflict procere 沖突程序
conflicting applications 沖突申請案
continuation application 繼續申請
continuation-in-part application 部分繼續申請案
contractual license 契約性許可證
contributory infringement 簡介侵犯
convention application 公約申請
convention country 公約國
convention date 公約日期
Convention Establishing the World Intellectual Property Organization 建立世界知識產權組織公約
convention period 公約期限
convention priority 公約優先權
right 版權
correction slip 勘誤表
counter pleadings 反訴狀
counterclaim 反訴
country code 國家代號
cross license 交叉許可證
data 資料
data exchange agreement 資料交換協議
data of application 申請日期
date of grant 授予日期
date of issue 頒發日期
date of patent 專利日期
date of publication 公布日期
dedication to the public 捐獻於公眾
defendant 被告人
defenses 辯護
defensive publication 防衛性公告
deferred examination 延遲審查
dependent claim 從屬權項
dependent patent 從屬專利
Derwent Publications Ltd. 德溫特出版有限公司
design patent 外觀設計專利
development 發展
disclaimer 放棄權項
disclosure 公開
division 分案
divisional application 分案申請
domination patent 支配專利
drawing 附圖
ration of patent 專利有效期
economic patent 經濟專利
effective filing date 實際申請日期
employee』s invention 雇員發明
EPO 歐洲專利局
European Patent Office 歐洲專利局
ESARIPO 英語非洲工業產權組織
European Patent Convention 歐洲專利公約
evidence 證據
examination 審查
examination countries 審查制國家
examination for novelty 新穎性審查
examiner 審查員
examiner』s report 審查員報告
exclusive license 獨占性許可證
exclusive right 專有權
experimental use 實驗性使用
expired patent 期滿專利
exploitation of a patent 實施專利
exposition priority 展覽優先權
expropriation 徵用
extension of term of a patent 延長專利期限
fee 費用
FICPI 國際工業產權律師聯合會
file 存檔原件
filing date 申請日期
filing fee 申請費
filing of an application 提出申請
final action 終局決定書
first-to-file principle 先申請原則
first-to-invention principle 先發明原則
force majeure 不可抗力
foreign patent application 外國專利申請
formal examination 形式審查
gazette 公報
Geneva Treaty on the International Recording of Scientific Discoveries 關於科學發現國際注冊日內瓦條約
grace period 寬限期
grant of a patent 授予專利權
holder of a patent 專利持有人
ICIREPAT 專利局間情報檢索國際合作巴黎聯盟委員會
Paris Union Committee for International Cooperation in Information Retrieval among Patent Offices 專利局間情報檢索國際合作巴黎聯盟委員會
IFIA 國際發明人協會聯合會
International Federation of Inventor』s Association 國際發明人協會聯合會
IBB 國際專利研究所
Institut International des Brevets 國際專利研究所
imitation 仿造
impeachment 控告
improvement 改進
improvement patent 改進專利
independence of patents 專利獨立
indication of source 產地標記
indirect infringement 間接侵犯
instrial applicability 工業實用性
instrial design 工業品外觀設計
instrial property 工業產權
information in the public domain 公開情報
infringement of a patent 侵犯專利權
infringement of a trade mark 侵犯商標權
INID 著錄資料識別碼
ICIREPAT Numbers for the Identification of Data 著錄資料識別碼
INPADOC 國際專利文獻中心
INSPEC 國際物理學和工程情報服務部
insufficient disclosure 公開不允分
intellectual property 知識產權
interdependent patents 相互依存的專利
interference procere 抵觸程序
interlocutory injunction 中間禁止令
interlocutory order 中間命令
International Convention for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants 保護植物新品種國際公約
International Patent Classification Agreement 國際專利分類協定
International Preliminary Examining Authority 國際初審單位
international protection 國際保護
International Searching Authority 國際檢索單位
invalidation 無效
invention 發明
inventive step 獨創性
inventor 發明人
inventor』s certificate 發明人證書
IPC 國際專利分類
International Patent Classification 國際專利分類
issue of a patent 辦法專利
joint applicants 共同申請人
joint invention 共同發明
joint inventors 共同發明人
joint patentees 共同專利權人
journal 公報
judgment 判決
junior party 後申請方
know-how 技術訣竅
lapsed patent 已終止的專利
lawsuit of a patent 專利訴訟
legal person 法人
legend 說明
LES International 國際許可貿易執行人協會
Licensing Executives Society International 國際許可貿易執行人協會
letters patent 專利證書
license 許可證
license agreement 許可證協議
license of course 當然許可證
licensing 許可證貿易
licensor 許可人
Lisbon Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration 保護原產地名稱及國際注冊里斯本協定
Locarno Agreement Establishing an International Classification for Instrial Design 建立工業品外觀設計國際分類洛迦諾協定
loss of a patent 專利權的喪失
Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks 商標國際注冊馬德里協定
Madrid Agreement for the Repression of False or Deceptive Indications of Source on Goods 制止商品產地虛假或欺騙性標記馬德里協定
main patent 主專利
maintenance fee 維持費
marking 標記
memoranm of understanding 諒解備忘錄
method 方法
microforms 微縮文件
minimum documentation 最少限度檢索文獻
minimum royalties 最低提成費
misuse of patent 濫用專利權
mixed license 混合許可證
model laws 示範法
most-favoured provision 最惠條款
name of invention 發明名稱
national treatment 國民待遇
natural person 自然人
neighboring rights 鄰接權
new varieties of plants 植物新品種
Nice Agreement Concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks 商標注冊用商品與服務國際分類尼斯協定
non-examining countries 不審查制國家
non-exclusive license 非獨占性許可證
non-obviousness 非顯而易見性
non-use of a patent 不實施專利
notary public 公正機關
notice of infringement 侵權通知
novelty 新穎性
OAPI 非洲知識產權組織
objection 異議
office action 專利局審查決定書
opposition 異議
originality 獨創性
owner of a patent 專利所有人
parent application 原申請
Paris Convention 巴黎公約
Paris Union 巴黎聯盟
patent 專利
patent act 專利法
patent agent 專利代理人
patent applied for 已申請專利
patent attorney 專利律師
patent classification 專利分類
patent documentation 專利文獻
patent documents 專利文件
patent families 同族專利
patent for an invention 發明專利
patent law 專利法
patent license 專利許可證
patent number 專利號
patent of addition 增補專利
patent of confirmation 確認專利
patent of importation 輸入專利
patent of introction 引進專利
patent of revalidation 再效專利
patent office 專利局
patent pending 專利未決
patent right 專利權
patent rules 專利實施細則
patent system 專利制度
patentability 專利性
patented invention 專利發明
patentee 專利權人
patenting 授予專利權
PCT 專利合作條約
PCT Union 專利合作條約
pending application 未決申請
period of a patent 專利有效期
person skilled in the art 所屬技術領域的專業人員
petition 請求書
petty patent 小專利
plaintiff 原告人
plant patent 植物專利
pleadings 起訴狀
precautional patent 預告專利
precedents 判例
prescription 時效
prevention of unfair competitionprincipal patent 主專利
prior art 先有技術
prior use 先用
priority 優先權
priority claim 優先權聲明
priority declaration 優先權聲明
process patent 方法專利
processing of an application 申請案的處理
proct patent 產品專利
provisional specification 臨時說明書
publication 公布
reclassification 再分類
reexamination 復審
refusal 駁回
register of patents 專利登記冊
registered patent 登記專利
registered trade mark 注冊商標
registration 登記
registration countries 登記制國家
reissue patent 再頒發專利
rejection 駁回
remedy 補救
renewal fee 續展費
request 請求書
restoration of a lapsed patent 恢復已終止的專利
restricted conditions 限制條款
review 復審
revival of an abandoned application 恢復已放棄的申請
revocation of a patent 撤銷專利
royalties 提成費
Science Abstracts 科學文摘
scientific discovery 科學發現
scope of protection 保護范圍
seal 蓋章
search 檢索
secret patent 機密專利
service invention 職務發明
service mark 服務標記
signature 簽署
simple license 普通許可證
single applicant 單獨申請人
sliding scale of royalties 滑動提成費
sole license 排他性許可證
specification 說明書
state of the art 先有技術水平
statement of claim 訴訟陳述
statement of defense 辯護陳述
substance patent 物質專利
substantive examination 實質性審查
succession 繼承
sufficiency of description 充分描述
technical assistance 技術協助
technical data 技術資料
technology transfer 技術轉移
temporary protection 臨時保護
term of a patent 專利有效期
The Hague Agreement Concerning the International Deposit of Instrial Designs 工業品外觀設計國際保存海牙協定
title of invention 發明名稱
title to patent 專利所有權
trade mark 商標
Trademark Registration Treaty 商標注冊條約
trade name 廠商名稱
trial 審判
unfair competition 不正當競爭
unity of invention 發明單一性
Universal Copyright Convention 世界版權公約
unpatentable subject matter 不能取得專利的主題
use patent 用途專利
utility certificate 實用證書
utility model 實用新型
Vienna Agreement Establishing an International Classification of the Figurative Elements of Marks 建立商標圖形要素國際分類維也納協定
Vienna Agreement for the Protection of Type Faces and their International Deposit 印刷字體保護及其國際保存維也納協定
WIPO 世界知識產權組織
withdrawal of an application 撤回申請
witness 證人
working of a patent 實施專利
World Intellectual Property Organization 世界知識產權組這
WPI 世界專利索引
World Patent Index 世界專利索引